Is buying random stocks and after that selling off those that go down a good way to lessen capital gains tax?
These directives does not mitigate any stability risk. They are really meant to force UA's to refresh risky information, not retain UA's from being retaining information.
Important to know is that when an HTML page is served over an HTTP connection, and also a header is existing in equally the HTTP reaction headers as well as the HTML tags, then the a person laid out in the HTTP response header will get precedence over the HTML meta tag.
Obviously, this will not be feasible for being implemented across the entire site, but at least for some critical pages, you are able to do that. Hope this aids.
I have an ASP.Web MVC three application. This application requests information via jQuery. jQuery phone calls back again to a controller action that returns results in JSON format.
"no-store" sometimes loaded from cache without even making an attempt a conditional request. Firefox responds much better to "no-store" but still sometimes loads from cache should you reload instantly afterwords. What a mess!
In the aged HTTP spec, the wording was even much better, explicitly telling browsers to disregard cache directives for back again button history.
After a certain amount of research we came up with the following list of headers that looked as if it would cover most browsers:
It might be really great to secure a reference bit of code commented to point which works for all browsers and which is required for particular browser, like versions.
On the get more info other hand, cacheing headers are unreliable in meta features; for one, any Internet proxies among the site plus the consumer will fully dismiss them. It is best to generally make use of a real HTTP header for headers for example Cache-Control and Pragma.
See also How to prevent google chrome from caching my inputs, esp concealed kinds when consumer simply click back? without which Chrome might reload but protect the previous information of factors -- in other words, use autocomplete="off".
Browsers should validate freshness of cached stale content ahead of working with it, but It is far from required unless the extra directive need to-revalidate is specified.
There are two techniques that I know of. The first is to inform the browser to not cache the page. Environment the Response to no cache takes care of that, nevertheless as you suspect the browser will usually disregard this directive. The other strategy is usually to set the date time of your reaction to your point Sooner or later.
Moreover, jQuery and other consumer frameworks will attempt to trick the browser into not applying its cached version of the resource by adding stuff into the url, like a timestamp or GUID. This is certainly effective in making the browser ask for the resource again but doesn't really prevent caching.